An article by this title appeared in the New Scientist magazine, discussing one company’s readiness to build microwave ray guns able to beam sounds directly into people’s heads. The capabilities of this technology parallel the torture-like effects experienced by victims of directed energy weapons. The device, dubbed MEDUSA uses beamed microwaves to cause a “shockwave inside the skull that can be detected by the ears.”

Does the refinement of this technology add validity to the numerous claims of individuals being used involuntary as test subjects for microwave beam weapons? Such technology cannot be refined to the point of manufacture without extensive testing on human subjects of various ages and physical makeup. Do you know of anyone whose job description includes being a test dummy for beamed microwaves that create a “shockwave inside the skull?”  Is there a reasonable likelihood that isolated American citizens are being used involuntarily to develop both the capability and methodology used in operating these weapons. Who are they testing it on?

Additional References:
MEDUSA: Microwave Crowd Control Raygun
ABC News report on MEDUSA

I never met Rena, nor knew much about her personally, with the exception of a blog she kept of her experiences as a victim of “gang-stalking.” Her blog captured my attention due to an honesty that set it apart from the murky sea of online propaganda that masquerades as victims’ accounts. She was a visually impaired University of Minnesota student, being trained in social services when her ordeal began in 2007. A friend of hers left a final comment on her unfinished blog, stating that Rena recently committed suicide. Her heartrending story, and its outcome, deeply grieved me. I know her despair. Her brief blog was a plea for help, and a struggle to understand the bizarre cruelty that made her life intolerable. It may be that she was chosen as a target of convenience for practice by bored teams of  “gang-stalkers.” Her precious life was little more than a toy for amusement in their hands. Does anyone deserve such inhumane and unjust treatment?

“Do not take revenge, my friends, but leave room for God’s wrath, for it is written: “It is mine to avenge; I will repay,” says the Lord” -Romans 12:19 (New International Version)

Is there a connection? Or, is it merely a coincidence? As the pattern of directed energy weapons torture and community policing based gang-stalking takes on national proportions, so does another phenomenon: Hollywood’s releasing of a torrent of comic-book based “superhero” movies. What connection can there be between these two trends?

First, lets look at what these two trends hold in common; they both glorify vigilante violence. Gang-stalking, as practiced by community policing groups, is a form of state-sponsored vigilantism designed to isolate and destroy individuals targeted as victims by covert government agencies. What does this have in common with every comic-book superhero ever created? “The implied policy message in comic books is one of vigilantism, in which moral justice trumps legitimate criminal procedure.” —Cultural criminology and kryptonite: Apocalyptic and retributive constructions of crime and justice in comic books. This book (source of the aforementioned quote), written by two leading criminology experts from St. Francis College, and John Jay College of Criminal Justice (USA), explores the concept of vigilante justice and retribution by comic book heroes.

Comic books and community policing based psychological terror campaigns have the same core theme: Vigilante justice is the preferred way to restore the role of law in a community. However, the irony of real-world gang-stalking is that it is being developed as a tool of covert federal agencies. In this, we also see a precedent in comic books. Isn’t it true that comic books have long promoted the clandestine relationship between government and the “bad boy violence” of superheros? That is, as long as superhero violence benefits those in power.

Is it merely a coincidence that a barrage of superhero movies are being released concurrently with numerous complaints of injustice stemming from covert agency sponsored psychological terror campaigns supported by community policing groups? USA Today, in the article “Hollywood, Pentagon Share Rich Past“ (3/07/05) states: “The FBI created its entertainment office in the 1930s, around the time James Cagney played a fearless FBI agent in the 1935 movie ‘G’ Men. The agency “realized a lot of people were getting their information from popular culture” and wanted to ensure agents were portrayed accurately. . .” The article further notes that the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, and the CIA all have Hollywood liaison offices. These offices exist to promote movies that provide a favorable view of the respective government agencies and their agendas. Can Hollywood be used to subtly promote a favorable view of government-sponsored covert extralegal vigilantism occurring in our communities?

I have often observed a fondness for the iconographic symbols of superheros by many individuals who engage in gang-stalking in my community. Often, the younger participants will have their vehicles emblazoned with the logos of Batman, Superman and other comic book characters. In fact, one participant would often wear a superman t-shirt under his postal uniform. Another, in Newark, NJ, had his vehicle customized to resemble the Batmobile.

How may the seemingly endless string of comic book based movies benefit government agencies developing national psychological (psyops) operations that include directed energy weapons and community policing based gang-stalking? Well, think of the appeal in the opportunity to be a “superhero” in the local community, supporting the “good guys” by operating outside the law with their covert protection and approval? Modern movies can exert a powerful influence the thinking and attitudes of the common man in this regard.

I would be remiss if i did not mention one departure from the classic model of superhero violence in my experience. In comic books, the hero usually wreaks his violence upon a conscious victim. Not so with directed energy weapons used by covert Federal agencies. With remote technology employed from a nearby apartment or home, the “hero” beats his victim even as he sleeps; using the silent blunt force of infrasound through-the-wall weapons, and the nerve damaging effects of targeted microwaves.

Again, I ask. Is there a connection? The warped justice of comic books is coming to our communities in the form of federally sponsored psyops (psychological operations). These operations trample true justice by targeting and terrorizing individuals without due process of law. Many victims are being used as involuntary test subjects for cruel new technologies. Others may be whistle-blowers or targets of vendettas. The innocent are being abused. Whether the connection to superhero propaganda is intentional or coincidental, there is no question that we are on the threshold of a cruel new age of real-world comic book violence.

Practical Considerations and Modern Trends

Are the constant stream of superhero movies that glorify vigilante justice for the “greater good” a form of propaganda preparing the nation for martial law and the suspension of constitutional rights? Serious students of current events are aware of the enormous powers granted the President and Federal agencies such as FEMA during a catastrophic national event. As an insightful article by the Air Force Law Review (The Imposition of Martial Law, Spring, 2000) indicates, the military would play a dominant role in civilian affairs that citizens may resist. The challenge is to suppress any “traditional prejudice against military involvement in civil affairs.” In a speech by Congressman Jim McDermott before the House of Representatives on Martial Law Concerns, he stated that “FEMA has practiced” for the possibility of martial law and large scale internment camps in the United States.

It may well be that the harassment that innocent victims of directed energy weapons and community policing “gang-stalking” are experiencing are federally sponsored covert training routines for this murky scenario. We may be the early victims in a paradigm shift in the way our government treats its citizens. In my experience, after more than ten years of such persecution, this has little to do with traditional law enforcement. The military origins of these routines become more obvious with time. Something is “brewing.” I cannot say for certain what the true motives behind these attacks are. However, what I am certain of is my response. I will uphold superior Godly principles in my dealings with my fellowman and refuse to be swept into the cesspool of intrigue and violence that surrounds me.

“The children of God and the children of the Devil are evident by this fact: Everyone who does not carry on righteousness does not originate with God, neither does he who does not love his brother. For this is the message which YOU have heard from [the] beginning, that we should have love for one another; not like Cain, who originated with the wicked one and slaughtered his brother. And for the sake of what did he slaughter him? Because his own works were wicked, but those of his brother [were] righteous.” - 1 John 3:10-12

References:
Comic Book Movies Keep On Coming
An article from the Dept of Defense on their collaboration with the makers of major superhero movies
American Forces Press Services article on Air Force collaboration on “Iron Man” superhero movie
Air Force Law Review: The Imposition of Martial Law in the United States
Time For Heroes: Propaganda & The Superhero
Time For Heroes: Guardian Newspaper

If you study the behavior of any group long enough, you begin to detect patterns and routines. As a victim of government sponsored harassment for over ten years I begin to see the same schemes and traps used over and over again. One such scheme is chronicled in an earlier installment I entitled He Came…He Saw…He Scowled. This past evening, I experienced a repeat of that scheme. Different players. Same sad scheme.

As is my practice on most weekday evenings, I visited the Pure Fitness Health Club on 35th & Northern Blvd (Phoenix, Arizona) for a workout. From the onset of my membership here it has been quite clear that covert agents and their support teams populate both the staff and membership of this gym during my workouts. That’s not a problem. I am here only for a workout, not to socialize. They occasionally play petty psychological games which I usually ignore. However, this particular evening became rather interesting because two new faces appeared.

I was on a cross-trainer machine and pulled my mp3 player out of my pocket to change the song. In a few seconds two white males, perhaps in their mid 30’s came and stood very close to me. These were new faces, and were wearing typical Pure Fitness staff shirts. I immediately sensed that they were probably agents assigned to keep me under surveillance, getting a closer look at my actions. I continued my workout, while keeping an eye on them in my peripheral vision.

Because they were standing so close, I made a gesture indicating that I wanted them to move away a bit. They clearly did not like that, but did move. One of them shouted “Hey man, how’s it going!” in a condescending “pseudo-Black” tone of voice (see footnote A). “I do not respond to “hey man,” Mister or sir is preferred,” I replied. My tone was businesslike and terse. I wanted them to know that I saw them for what they really were in spite of their “official” Pure Fitness staff t-shirts. They were older than the typical trainers at the gym and stood out like sore thumbs. These were not gym jocks. I was not interested in playing a game and wanted to cut the conversation short. “Enjoy your work out sir,” one of them replied. “Thank you, sir,” I stated ending the conversation. They stood there a bit longer. The problem was that the treadmill behind me was being used by another member of the club. They did not want to leave until that treadmill was occupied by one of their agents to maintain surveillance (see footnote B). About two minutes later one of their covert female agents was able to occupy the treadmill. Then, the two men left for another part of the building.

I knew that my response did not sit well with them. In truth, I was not genuinely angry. There was a motive behind my response. What I knew was this: If they thought I was angered by their presence they would try to exploit my emotions before I left that evening. They will setup a scheme to lure me into a confrontation because of my “annoyance”. By doing so, they would confirm that they were in fact a part of the team of harassers working against me. I simply had to wait and see what they would do. Well, I finished my workout in the next 45 minutes and headed for the entrance. What took place next was a carbon copy of the scheme used by The Scowler years ago.

The same two agents were waiting outside, directly in front of the entrance as I left. Their pose had that “you want to make something of it, tough guy” look. And, like The Scowler, they said nothing. It was a stance designed to provoke an angry response. I knew why. Like The Scowler, they hoped to lure me into a confrontation that would be witnessed by other agents, staff, bystanders, police, and no doubt recorded on surveillance cameras. By setting this trap, they confirmed that they were in fact plainclothes agents. I simply walked past them with nary a glance, got into my car and drove off. I saw two other agents standing by their vehicles as I drove away. One was grinning, and for good reason. He knew I had avoided yet another of the myriad of traps they have set for me over the years.

Footnote A: If you have read all of my posts so far, you will see that although I am Black, and the bulk of my harassers are White, I do not blame everything I have experienced on racism. The fact is that these attacks are totally opportunistic. If they think racism is your weakness, they will make every attack (and attacker) appear to be racist in nature; If you have a problem with the police, they will make it appear as if the police are behind the harassment. Do you see how it works? The targeted individual is carefully watched for reactions to a wide variety of abuses and humiliating tactics. They are probing for weaknesses and emotional “hot-buttons”–actions and perceptions that anger the victim.” Whatever path they can take to manipulate a victims emotions will be exploited. The appearance and approach taken by your attacker is simply another weapon in the battle for your mind. Knowing this keeps me from viewing their attacks as personal affronts–they are simply tools in the overall psychological war against me.

Footnote B: The target of psychological warfare is under 24 hour surveillance (I have endured this for over ten years). The surveillance is not in the larger sense a search for evidence of wrongdoing. Rather, it is done in a way intended to humiliate, anger, and terrorize the target. You are provided constant visual reminders of that fact that you are being watched. In doing this, the surveillance is intended as a form of constant, dehumanizing, psychological torment.

March, 31, 2008 - Today, about 6:35pm, one member of a group of gang-stalkers following my vehicle in traffic had a collision with a motorcyclist at aprox. 6:35 PM in front of 2040 Cactus Rd (Cactus Place Apartments, near Cactus Rd. & 21st Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85029. The “gang-stalker” a middle-aged woman of Hispanic descent was driving a red Chevy Cavalier as seen in the photos. She drove abruptly out of the entrance of 2040 Cactus Rd. (Cactus Place Apartments) and struck a motorcyclist passing going westward on Cactus Rd. I was in the center turn lane on Cactus Road, adjacent to the car wash near the corner of 19th Ave. I had pulled into the center lane to allow other vehicles with “gang-stalkers” to pass by. They were engaged in a common practice of what I call “drive-bys.” This involves having one of their vehicles repeatedly passing mine in coordination with pedestrians on the street (they are often planted by the gang-stalkers and part of their team effort). Evidently these actions are designed to impress upon their victims how any contact with others is controlled and prevented by the gang-stalkers. Or they may simply surround my vehicle in traffic to control my speed and movement as a form of harassment. Also, they will drive with very high beam headlights (commonly called brighting) aimed at me as a form of harassment (these appear to be special bright headlamps installed just for this harassment). Typically, they are guided by an airborne team manager (usually in a helicopter). As a result, I make an effort to avoid them with maneuvers to avoid contact or avoid participating in their petty traffic games. One common tactic I employ is to pull over and allow their “caravan” to pass before preceeding as I did today.

The woman driving the vehicle was evidently “scheduled” to drive out of the driveway to coincide with two pedestrians passing my car. Evidently, she nor the persons directing their harassment did not see or time her actions with the motorcyclist correctly. I saw this as it occurred from my rear-view-mirror. I turned around and drove back. The motorcyclist look dazed but did not appear to be severely injured. I am certain that the motorcyclist was also a part of the “gang-stalking” unit who had a case of bad timing. A firetruck quickly drove up to administer aid (evidently from the fire station on Cactus Rd. less than a block away). As you can see from the photos the car driven by the gang-stalker sustained moderate front end damage from the collision. The woman driving the Chevy Cavalier was on a cellphone and shouted to me as I drove by: “Did you know you caused an accident?” Of course that is not true. I was a block away from the accident. She struck the motorcyclist as a result of her own bad timing and rushing to join the group of gang-stalkers following me.

Police and a firetruck were quickly on the scene to administer aid. A light Ford truck, Phoenix Police license #G776BW and Phoenix fire truck license #G944CB were on the scene. I have a record of other vehicles on the scene as well.

How Would You Feel?
How would you feel knowing that someone who has become your persecutor suffers calamity? Would you gloat over his misfortune? How should I feel in this instance? I know that gloating, or taking any pleasure in another’s’ suffering is wrong. Even if that person is an enemy. Do you remember the illustration of the Good Samaritan related by Jesus Christ (Luke 10:29-37)? In that parable, a Samaritan on seeing a Jewish man abandoned and helpless after being robbed and beaten on an isolated road comes to his aid, going out of his way to render assistance. What made this such a powerful example is the fact that the Jews despised Samaritans, treating them with the sort of contempt a Klu Klux Klan member would reserve for hated minorities. The Samaritan refused to gloat at the misfortune of someone who normally was his oppressor. Rather, he did what he could to render assistance. He did not adopt the hateful attitude of the misguided Jews of his day. That nobility of character is no less vital and essential in modern men.

To gloat over an enemy’s misfortune would make me no better than the gang-stalkers. My survival, indeed my daily victories over these cruel campaigns comes from refusing to mimic the pettiness, spitefulness and cruelty that drives their actions. If I was in a position to, I would have rendered aid to that fallen cyclist, regardless of what he had done to me. I cannot allow the weaknesses of my enemies to become my own! “Return evil for evil to no one. Provide fine things in the sight of all men.” - Romans 12:17