How would you treat someone falsely accused by neighbors and treated as an outcast? What if helping such an individual put your own reputation and safety at risk?

Here is a true life account from the 2011 Yearbook of Jehovah’s Witnesses, from the country of Suriname. In this South American country, when someone is accused of sorcery (witchcraft), they are subject to beatings, theft and isolation. False accusations are quite common.

Pasensi was a former village head in Surinam, and a close friend of chieftain of the entire river area in his district. He had always opposed Jehovah’s Witnesses in his area, thinking they were a threat to village traditions.

In time, a local young man claimed to have the ability to identify villagers who practiced sorcery. He gained many followers who accompanied the young man along the river in canoes, beating the accused and taking all that belonged to them. Large sums of money had to be paid over to “cleanse” the accused of the evil spirit they were said to possess. Among the many innocent victims was Pasensi, who was beaten and left for dead. Even his friend, the chieftain, could not help him, afraid that his own life and reputation would be at stake if he helped someone accused of sorcery. Friends and relatives were forbidden to give any help. However, Pasensi’s son-in-law mustered up courage and took him to a village inhabited mostly by Jehovah’s Witnesses. The Witnesses discussed the matter and, knowing the risk to themselves, decided to help. They arranged for Pasensi to be taken by canoe to a nearby village where a fellow Witness works as the station manager at an airstrip. From there, this former opposer was flown to a city for medical treatment.

Pasensi, who recovered from his wounds, was moved by the love shown him by the people he once opposed. He began to study the Bible and was baptized as one of Jehovah’s Witnesses in December 2009. Pasensi, though he is 80 years old, is now a zealous minister of Jehovah’s Witnesses.

“By this all will know that you are my (Jesus Christ’s) disciples, if you have love among yourselves . . .” - John 13:35 

An article in the Times of India, Aug. 12, 2011, discusses a new ultra-thin “electronic skin” device developed by researchers at the University of Illinois that allows for remote wireless monitoring of health related bodily functions from a thin rubbery material that can be applied to skin like a temporary tattoo. . .”  It uses a “diverse array of electronic components mounted on a thin, rubbery substrate, including sensors, LEDs, transistors, radio frequency capacitors, wireless antennas, and conductive coils and solar cells for power”to provide remote, non-invasive monitoring of a variety of bodily functions.

“We think this could be an important conceptual advance in wearable electronics, to achieve something that is almost unnoticeable to the wearer,” said University of Illinois electrical and computer engineering professor Todd Coleman, who co-led the multi-disciplinary team. 

I, like many other targets of involuntary psychological and covert torture weapons testing have long been aware that our bodily functions and emotional state have been remotely monitored  by some form of undetectable wireless technology. Could some variation of this technology have made that possible? Typically, most new technologies that have military potential are employed covertly for some time before being applied to consumer applications. Is that true of this “electronic skin” technology?  Perhaps there are covert applications of “electronic skin’ that are much smaller (making them nearly invisible) that can be adhered to the skin without consent. It is quite conceivable to envision government operatives using wireless technology such as smart phones or laptops to monitor the emotional and physical state of involuntary test subjects in various setting throughout the day. Could this technology, deemed “unnoticeable to the wearer” explain the covert physiological monitoring of involuntary participants in the development of covert psychological weapons?

 Additional Resources
Science Magazine, 8/12/11
Electronic ‘Skin’ Can Monitor Your Heart - CNN
High Tech ‘Tattoo” Will Monitor Vital Signs

The Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues convenes its fifth meeting in New York City on May 18-19th, 2011. Its agenda focuses on the issues of ethics and human experimentation. It remains to be seen what impact this will have on the lives of involuntary experimentees in covert remote energy weapons and psychological torture. To give some historical context to this issue, here is a brief list of some of the involuntary and controversial human experimentation admittedly conducted with government sponsorship over the course of the twentieth century. Source: healthnewsnetwork.com

1931 Dr. Cornelius Rhoads, under the auspices of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Investigations, infects human subjects with cancer cells. He later goes on to establish the U.S. Army Biological Warfare facilities in Maryland, Utah, and Panama, and is named to the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. While there, he begins a series of radiation exposure experiments on American soldiers and civilian hospital patients.

1932 The Tuskegee Syphilis Study begins. 200 black men diagnosed with syphilis are never told of their illness, are denied treatment, and instead are used as human guinea pigs in order to follow the progression and symptoms of the disease. They all subsequently die from syphilis, their families never told that they could have been treated.

1935 The Pellagra Incident. After millions of individuals die from Pellagra over a span of two decades, the U.S. Public Health Service finally acts to stem the disease. The director of the agency admits it had known for at least 20 years that Pellagra is caused by a niacin deficiency but failed to act since most of the deaths occured within poverty-striken black populations.

1940 Four hundred prisoners in Chicago are infected with Malaria in order to study the effects of new and experimental drugs to combat the disease. Nazi doctors later on trial at Nuremberg cite this American study to defend their own actions during the Holocaust.

1942 Chemical Warfare Services begins mustard gas experiments on approximately 4,000 servicemen. The experiments continue until 1945 and made use of Seventh Day Adventists who chose to become human guinea pigs rather than serve on active duty.

1943 In response to Japan’s full-scale germ warfare program, the U.S. begins research on biological weapons at Fort Detrick, MD.

1944 U.S. Navy uses human subjects to test gas masks and clothing. Individuals were locked in a gas chamber and exposed to mustard gas and lewisite.

1945 Project Paperclip is initiated. The U.S. State Department, Army intelligence, and the CIA recruit Nazi scientists and offer them immunity and secret identities in exchange for work on top secret government projects in the United States.

1945 “Program F” is implemented by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC). This is the most extensive U.S. study of the health effects of fluoride, which was the key chemical component in atomic bomb production. One of the most toxic chemicals known to man, fluoride, it is found, causes marked adverse effects to the central nervous system but much of the information is squelched in the name of national security because of fear that lawsuits would undermine full-scale production of atomic bombs.

1946 Patients in VA hospitals are used as guinea pigs for medical experiments. In order to allay suspicions, the order is given to change the word “experiments” to “investigations” or “observations” whenever reporting a medical study performed in one of the nation’s veteran’s hospitals.

1947 Colonel E.E. Kirkpatrick of the U.S. Atomic Energy Comission issues a secret document (Document 07075001, January 8, 1947) stating that the agency will begin administering intravenous doses of radioactive substances to human subjects.

1947 The CIA begins its study of LSD as a potential weapon for use by American intelligence. Human subjects (both civilian and military) are used with and without their knowledge.

1950 Department of Defense begins plans to detonate nuclear weapons in desert areas and monitor downwind residents for medical problems and mortality rates.

1950 In an experiment to determine how susceptible an American city would be to biological attack, the U.S. Navy sprays a cloud of bacteria from ships over San Franciso. Monitoring devices are situated throughout the city in order to test the extent of infection. Many residents become ill with pneumonia-like symptoms.

1951 Department of Defense begins open air tests using disease-producing bacteria and viruses. Tests last through 1969 and there is concern that people in the surrounding areas have been exposed.

1953 U.S. military releases clouds of zinc cadmium sulfide gas over Winnipeg, St. Louis, Minneapolis, Fort Wayne, the Monocacy River Valley in Maryland, and Leesburg, Virginia. Their intent is to determine how efficiently they could disperse chemical agents.

1953 Joint Army-Navy-CIA experiments are conducted in which tens of thousands of people in New York and San Francisco are exposed to the airborne germs Serratia marcescens and Bacillus glogigii.

1953 CIA initiates Project MKULTRA. This is an eleven year research program designed to produce and test drugs and biological agents that would be used for mind control and behavior modification. Six of the subprojects involved testing the agents on unwitting human beings.

1955 The CIA, in an experiment to test its ability to infect human populations with biological agents, releases a bacteria withdrawn from the Army’s biological warfare arsenal over Tampa Bay, Fl.

1955 Army Chemical Corps continues LSD research, studying its potential use as a chemical incapacitating agent. More than 1,000 Americans participate in the tests, which continue until 1958.

1956 U.S. military releases mosquitoes infected with Yellow Fever over Savannah, Ga and Avon Park, Fl. Following each test, Army agents posing as public health officials test victims for effects.

1958 LSD is tested on 95 volunteers at the Army’s Chemical Warfare Laboratories for its effect on intelligence.

1960 The Army Assistant Chief-of-Staff for Intelligence (ACSI) authorizes field testing of LSD in Europe and the Far East. Testing of the european population is code named Project THIRD CHANCE; testing of the Asian population is code named Project DERBY HAT.

1965 Project CIA and Department of Defense begin Project MKSEARCH, a program to develop a capability to manipulate human behavior through the use of mind-altering drugs.

1965 Prisoners at the Holmesburg State Prison in Philadelphia are subjected to dioxin, the highly toxic chemical component of Agent Orange used in Viet Nam. The men are later studied for development of cancer, which indicates that Agent Orange had been a suspected carcinogen all along.

1966 CIA initiates Project MKOFTEN, a program to test the toxicological effects of certain drugs on humans and animals.

1966 U.S. Army dispenses Bacillus subtilis variant niger throughout the New York City subway system. More than a million civilians are exposed when army scientists drop lightbulbs filled with the bacteria onto ventilation grates.

1967 CIA and Department of Defense implement Project MKNAOMI, successor to MKULTRA and designed to maintain, stockpile and test biological and chemical weapons.

1968 CIA experiments with the possibility of poisoning drinking water by injecting chemicals into the water supply of the FDA in Washington, D.C.

1969 Dr. Robert MacMahan of the Department of Defense requests from congress $10 million to develop, within 5 to 10 years, a synthetic biological agent to which no natural immunity exists.

1970 Funding for the synthetic biological agent is obtained under H.R. 15090. The project, under the supervision of the CIA, is carried out by the Special Operations Division at Fort Detrick, the army’s top secret biological weapons facility. Speculation is raised that molecular biology techniques are used to produce AIDS-like retroviruses.

1970 United States intensifies its development of “ethnic weapons” (Military Review, Nov., 1970), designed to selectively target and eliminate specific ethnic groups who are susceptible due to genetic differences and variations in DNA.

1975 The virus section of Fort Detrick’s Center for Biological Warfare Research is renamed the Fredrick Cancer Research Facilities and placed under the supervision of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) . It is here that a special virus cancer program is initiated by the U.S. Navy, purportedly to develop cancer-causing viruses. It is also here that retrovirologists isolate a virus to which no immunity exists. It is later named HTLV (Human T-cell Leukemia Virus).

1977 Senate hearings on Health and Scientific Research confirm that 239 populated areas had been contaminated with biological agents between 1949 and 1969. Some of the areas included San Francisco, Washington, D.C., Key West, Panama City, Minneapolis, and St. Louis.

1978 Experimental Hepatitis B vaccine trials, conducted by the CDC, begin in New York, Los Angeles and San Francisco. Ads for research subjects specifically ask for promiscuous homosexual men.

1981 First cases of AIDS are confirmed in homosexual men in New York, Los Angeles and San Francisco, triggering speculation that AIDS may have been introduced via the Hepatitis B vaccine

1985 According to the journal Science (227:173-177), HTLV and VISNA, a fatal sheep virus, are very similar, indicating a close taxonomic and evolutionary relationship.

1986 According to the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (83:4007-4011), HIV and VISNA are highly similar and share all structural elements, except for a small segment which is nearly identical to HTLV. This leads to speculation that HTLV and VISNA may have been linked to produce a new retrovirus to which no natural immunity exists.

1986 A report to Congress reveals that the U.S. Government’s current generation of biological agents includes: modified viruses, naturally occurring toxins, and agents that are altered through genetic engineering to change immunological character and prevent treatment by all existing vaccines.

1987 Department of Defense admits that, despite a treaty banning research and development of biological agents, it continues to operate research facilities at 127 facilities and universities around the nation.

1990 More than 1500 six-month old black and hispanic babies in Los Angeles are given an “experimental” measles vaccine that had never been licensed for use in the United States. CDC later admits that parents were never informed that the vaccine being injected to their children was experimental.

1994 With a technique called “gene tracking,” Dr. Garth Nicolson at the MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, TX discovers that many returning Desert Storm veterans are infected with an altered strain of Mycoplasma incognitus, a microbe commonly used in the production of biological weapons. Incorporated into its molecular structure is 40 percent of the HIV protein coat, indicating that it had been man-made.

1994 Senator John D. Rockefeller issues a report revealing that for at least 50 years the Department of Defense has used hundreds of thousands of military personnel in human experiments and for intentional exposure to dangerous substances. Materials included mustard and nerve gas, ionizing radiation, psychochemicals, hallucinogens, and drugs used during the Gulf War .

1995 U.S. Government admits that it had offered Japanese war criminals and scientists who had performed human medical experiments salaries and immunity from prosecution in exchange for data on biological warfare research.

1995 Dr. Garth Nicolson, uncovers evidence that the biological agents used during the Gulf War had been manufactured in Houston, TX and Boca Raton, Fl and tested on prisoners in the Texas Department of Corrections.

1996 Department of Defense admits that Desert Storm soldiers were exposed to chemical agents.

1997 Eighty-eight members of Congress sign a letter demanding an investigation into bioweapons use & Gulf War Syndrome.

Are there ongoing, secret programs of involuntary testing of covert remote directed-energy torture weapons and psychological torture in the United States? Experts say that the kind of unethical medical studies and research that occurred half a century ago could still happen again despite more than 1,000 rules and regulations that should prevent such abuses. Bioethicists and researchers spoke Tuesday (March 1, 2011) before a presidential panel in Washington. The meeting was triggered by the government’s apology last fall for federal doctors infecting prisoners and mental patients in Guatemala with syphilis 65 years ago. President Barack Obama ordered his Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues to explore whether such a study could ever happen again.-Associated Press

The Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues met on February 28 - March 1, 2011. A Public Comment Session on March 1st offered live testimony by alleged victims of remote monitoring, and torture with remote microwave and acoustic weapons. Here is a direct link to an online video archive of  the Public Comment session of The Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. These individuals, from all over the country (US) provide strikingly similar accounts of being victimized by covert torture weapons and being stalked and harassed (commonly termed “gang-stalking”) on a 24-hour basis.

To my recollection, this is the first, formal presentation of victim’s accounts before any formal federally financed board or committee. Those who participate in community policing and other “citizen watch” groups that stalk, surveil and harass individuals may get a deeper understanding of the abuses they may be supporting by watching the video referenced above.

A well written article on the ABC News website (originally from Associated Press) provides highlights of the numerous extraordinary abuses of medical ethics in testing done on the poor, disabled, mental patients, wards of the state and prison inmates more than 40 years ago. It seems to be standard practice for government agencies to admit to that these abuses only after the statute of limitations for victims right to sue has expired.

Can you manipulate and express covert hostility toward others, day in and day out with impunity? Perhaps some imagine that simply having their psychological abuses, cruelty, and bullying of others protected by the cloak of law is enough. Those who enjoy taunting and persecuting others need to pay careful attention to recent findings in a study conducted by The National Institute of Aging on the destructive health effects of an antagonistic personality. When we express cruel, manipulative behavior as an aggressor, or as a response to aggression, we put our own health at great risk.

“Antagonistic individuals, especially those who are manipulative and aggressive, have greater increases in arterial thickening, independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors,” reported Angelina Sutin, PhD, of the National Institute on Aging in Bethesda, Md and colleagues in the American Heart Association journal Hypertension. Arterial thickening, especially in the arteries carrying blood to the brain is considered a key risk factor leading to strokes.

“Psychological and social factors are just as strong, as this study clearly documented, in putting people at higher risk of heart disease and other health problems.” Redford Williams, MD, of Duke University, who was not involved with the study, commented that the findings highlight the largely unappreciated role of psychological factors in cardiovascular disease risk. Williams noted the degree of cardiovascular event risk suggested by the study findings as associated with antagonistic personality traits was comparable to that of high LDL cholesterol, hypertension, or smoking.

Is the temporary and perverse pleasure derived from such abusive behavior really worth it? Those who engage in psychological warfare and harassment in an effort to harm others should consider carefully the findings in this study. Of course, the Bible has said it all along. With respect to our treatment of others, “we reap what we sow.”.—Galatians 6:7

The Washington Post special report “Top Secret In America” has revealed the enormous growth in intelligence agencies and personnel working in the United States since 9/11. Over 850,000 personnel and private contractors have top secret security clearance, and literally thousands of agencies or private contracting firms have been created or reorganized in that time as well. I decided to use these facts as a talking point when approaching a number of young people employed in the surveillance and “gangstalking” I experience on a daily basis. Here is a typical conversation:

“Can I speak to you for a moment young man? May I ask, have you ever heard the word “Kristallnacht?” It is a German word that when translated means “Crystal Night.”

Typically the young person has no clue what I am talking about. So I usually continue:

“That word describes one of the greatest injustices in modern history. In one night, under the Nazi regime. thousands of young people roamed through Jewish neighborhoods in Germany destroying Jewish businesses and homes, and killing Jews. It was called Crystal Night because of the amount of broken glass left in the streets from the destruction. Can you guess what motivated young people about your age, and much like yourself, to do something so shocking and unlawful?”

Usually at this point I’ve got the young person’s attention. However, they usually cannot even guess why this incident occurred. They are also unaware of its significance as a major event in recent history. I continue:

“It was because they were convinced that Jews should be “crushed like bugs“ by vicious political propaganda. They were convinced by their own government that these people should be hated and destroyed as if they were insignificant bugs. Young man, do you think that something like that could ever happen again?”

That statement usually has a visceral impact on them. Why? Because the phrase “crush like a bug” is a very common expression used by these “gangstalkers” in my area. That is the intent behind their harassment. Therefore, by making use of their colloquialism, the young men I’m speaking to instantly make a mental connection between the cruel events of “Kristallnacht” and their own activities. At this point most become visibly uncomfortable, some simply start to walk away.

“There is an article in the Washington Post that discusses the tremendous growth in covert activity involving young people much like yourself in our own country. I ask to you to please go online and read it. It reveals that over 850,000 people are used in this country for covert activity. It is vital that you read that article. However, it is also vitally important to understand the historical significance of the activities you participate in. Recent history offers powerful lessons in this regard that you should be aware of. I share this information with you out of concern. Young people like yourself are the most gullible and manipulated group in this or any country. I want you to be well informed so that the decisions you make in life are morally sound and based on a clear understanding of all the issues involved. Do you understand what I am telling you?”

Most of the young people are respectful and get the point. We usually end on a respectful note. A few laugh it off. However, by the time I walk away, I have given them food for thought. I am not interested in the politics of this issue. I simply want young people to understand the morality of what they do, and to act in a way that protects the long-term interests of themselves and their fellowman. I also teach them something about myself in the process of conversing. I am not their enemy, nor am I the faceless “bug” they have been trained to view as worthless.

I cannot be a force for good in the lives of others if I mirror the hatred, cruelty and deception that attend the lives of so many today. I can continue to respond with unfailing strength and insight because Jehovah is my helper.

Here is a news story on organized gang-stalking, harassment, break-in and rape that was reported by KENS-5 News in San Antonio, Texas. I will offer no opinion on this story. I simply invite you to view it and draw your own conclusions. You can read the online account of this news report on the KENS-5 San Antonio website.

Rather than add any commentary to this story, I will simply let it speak for itself. An American investigative journalist has uncovered evidence suggesting the CIA peppered local food in a French farming town with the hallucinogenic drug LSD as part of a program of mind-control experimentation. The story, in the UK Telegraph of March 11, 2010 can be read here.

“In a world that is in chaos politically, socially, and environmentally, how can the human race sustain another 100 years?”—Stephen Hawking, world-renowned Theoretical Physicist.

After reading the article A Plan to Stem Foreclosures, Buried in a Paper Avalanche in the 6/29/09 NY Times, I came away amazed at how it so honestly encapsulates the fundamentally untrustworthy nature of many commercial institutions. This article details the daunting obstacles facing homeowners seeking mortgage modifications to avoid foreclosure. Many are finding that their applications and paperwork are literally disappearing upon being submitted to banks. Other are caught in a merry-go-round of repeated resubmissions of paperwork after being rejected for minor errors or missing documents. Are these coincidences? As the article suggests, banks may be under pressure not to make modifications for homeowners burdened with critical mortgage problems. In one case where the homeowner qualified for a mortgage modification, “the company refuses to take an application because the loan is owned by an investor who is unwilling to absorb a loss.”

Clearly, a fundamental disinterest, and more troubling callous disregard the community welfare can be discerned in this story. That uncivil disposition is often at the core of so many failed efforts to solve the inequities and injustices that afflict modern society. It reminds me of an observation made by former Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan in his recent book “The Age of Turbulence.” He comments on the ongoing devastation of “civility and civilization” that began with the first World War. There was a universal optimism prior to 1914. In the late 1800’s, “dehumanizing violence was on the decline,” and the rapid “pace of global invention” and medical science was improving the quality and longevity of life. “Human society seemed perfectible,” he observes. Now, as he candidly admits, due to the myriad of crisis facing modern society, our outlook is “starkly different.” Few men have had such intimate association with the powers governing modern civilization as long as Alan Greenspan. If he expresses no confidence in man’s efforts to perfect society, do we, who can only view such powers from a distance, have any good reason to do so?

Indeed, in spite of stunning advances in invention and medicine the devastation of civility and civilization continues. Who ever imagined that our generation would be grappling with genocide, torture, terrorism, mass starvation, widespread poverty and staggering inequites in the distribution of wealth? We live in a world climate fueled by our own selfishness, indifference and cruelty. As a result,  it is easy to see how “dehumanizing violence” such as involuntary testing of directed energy torture weapons and psychological warfare can find such fertile soil.

Dehumanizing Violence and Victims of Involuntary Weapons Testing
In order to justify ongoing harassment and psychological torture of a targeted individual, you (the torturer) must first dehumanize him, stripping him of human qualities or attributes. Once you perceive him as being less human than you are, you begin to justify the abuse he suffers in your own mind. The conscience becomes perverted by this faulty reasoning and justifies torture. In your eyes, he deserves it. Indeed, you’re convinced that the victim is ultimately responsible for whatever he suffers. That is why the covert agencies developing these cruel programs work tirelessly to paint their victims as criminals or social misfits.*see footnote

The cruelty itself becomes a perverse lure for the torturer. He takes pleasure in the suffering and discomfort of others. The Inquisition made the public slow-death-by-fire of so-called heretics a form of entertainment for both the Inquisitors and the morbidly curious public. Likewise, the covert agencies developing these programs, and the neighborhood groups that support them find an unnatural gratification in the discomfort and suffering of their victims. The ongoing cruelty also serves as a control on the victim, destroying his self esteem and initiative to pursue justice and relief. It becomes a virtual concentration camp, invisible to all but the torturers and his victim.

Alan Greenspan got it right. Human society is “starkly different” from the high expectations we had for it just over a century ago.

Footnote: I had a rather odd experience shortly after moving into my present residence. I stopped at the local gas station to pick up some bottled water. As I left the store and entered my car in the parking lot, a man quickly walked up just as I was about to close my door. He was a Black male in his early 30’s, dressed in stereotypical “street thug” attire. “I’m not asking for any money, I just want to show you something . . .” he said as I tried to close my driver’s side door. He had a brightly colored child’s pen in his hand and mumbled something that I can’t quite remember. What stands out however was his odd motion. He brings his hands close to me and them moves them back twice with this silly little pen in his hand. To someone standing outside, it would give the appearance that he was conducting a transaction or making an exchange. I told him to get away,  closing my door as quickly as possible. This was very unusual. He was not the normal panhandler asking for a handout. However, it was shortly after that encounter that many individuals among my neighbors began to participate in psychological harassment schemes employed against me locally. What I’ve surmised is this: In order to destroy my reputation locally, they needed some convincing evidence. Since I have never used drugs or engaged in any illicit activity, they would never gain such evidence by honest means. I am convinced that this encounter was recorded covertly (perhaps from another vehicle at the gas station) and used by someone in an official capacity to convince my new neighbors that I am engaged in some form of illicit activity.

“No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation” —Universal Declaration of Human Rights

The recent complaints of directed energy weapons torture and covert psychological attacks coming from numerous American citizens may be a byproduct of what is considered the hottest new market in weapons development: ” . . . namely the military and intelligence communities’ interest in drugs and other methods for degrading (mental) performance—of enemy soldiers and terrorists, of course—and perhaps reading their intentions and even controlling their minds.” —Minding Mental Minefields, scienceprogress.org. What ‘weapons systems” and methods are being developed for this new market?

The development of biochemical weapons and psychological methods of targeting the human mind are discussed in a quietly released 151 page National Research Report “Emerging Cognitive Neuroscience and Related Technologies” commissioned by the Defense Intelligence Agency, USA (full text of this report is available online). Scienceprogress.org commented on the report’s disclosure of “the emerging market in brain-targeted, performance-degrading techniques. Some experiments, it turns out, suggest that magnetic beams can be used to induce seizures in people, a tempting addition to the military’s armamentarium. More conventionally, as scientists discover new chemicals that can blur thinking or undermine an enemy’s willpower, and as engineers design aerosolized delivery systems that can deliver these chemicals directly to the lungs (and from there, the brains) of large groups of people, the prospect of influencing the behavior of entire enemy regiments becomes real.”

This report further indicates that the “applied research  . . . could be exploited for legal and forensic, military and police/public safety, and information and intelligence purposes.” — Emerging Cognitive Neuroscience and Related Technologies. In other words, the weaponized capacity  to “blur thinking,” “undermine willpower,” and “degrade performance” goes beyond military application. It will also be applied to local law enforcement and “public safety.”

Who are the test subjects for these developing programs of psychological warfare designed to “degrade” and “influence the behavior” of people? Our government has recently admitted to well over 10,000 incidents of involuntary medical and radiation experimentation on American citizens during the 20th century. Is it not logical to conclude that this emerging class of weapons systems and “techniques” targeting the human brain is also being tested involuntarily on numerous American citizens?

What Happens To Victims of Involuntary Brain Targeting Medical Experimentation?

Interestingly, this National Research Report comments rather bluntly on their plight: “Covert or classified military research findings will probably not be submitted for publication in the international literature, so they will escape the attention of publishers and peer reviewers. Thus, human-subjects protection in this sector of biomedical research cannot be guaranteed or assessed.” —Emerging Cognitive Neuroscience and Related Technologies, page 185. In other words, American citizens made victims of involuntary experimentation in this field will most likely be kept anonymous and stripped of all rights and protections under law.

How would you feel if your son or daughter became a covert victim of these programs? At the very least, can you better understand the plight of those covertly and willfully tortured by the same military, police and public safety agencies that should protect them?

Finally, I ask you the reader: Does this not give credence to the numerous complaints around the country from individuals who claim to be involuntary subjects of these developing weapons systems and methods? Victims complain of being covertly targeted by microwave and acoustic based beam weapons, sustained psychological attacks that include “gang stalking,” and noxious odors and fumes from aerosolized delivery systems. Their livelihoods, reputation and health are willfully and systematically destroyed in the process. They are isolated, and stripped of all rights and protections . . .

Have we finally found “the smoking gun” behind these covert crimes?